Andrew Miller Consulting

Open Source for America

Hat tip to the NYTimes and writer Ashlee Vance for this article on a new group called Open Source for America. I’m looking for some interesting things to come out of this group and will be supporting them however I am able.

Open Source for America (http://www.opensourceforamerica.org/) is a advocacy group for the use of Open Source standards and software in US Federal Government and includes an impressive list of board advisors including:

  • Roger Burkhard
  • Rishab Aiyer Ghosh
  • Marv Langston
  • Chris Lundberg
  • Dawn Meyerriecks
  • Eben Moglen
  • Arthur L. Money
  • Tim O’Reilly
  • Stormy Peters
  • Simon Phipps
  • Mark Shuttleworth
  • Paul Smith
  • Dr. Doug Stone
  • Michael Tiemann
  • Andrew Updegrove
  • William Vass
  • Anthony I. Wasserman
  • Jim Zemlin

From their website the groups Mission Statement is:

The mission of OSA is to educate decision makers in the U.S. Federal government about the advantages of using free and open source software; to encourage the Federal agencies to give equal priority to procuring free and open source software in all of their procurement decisions; and generally provide an effective voice to the U.S. Federal government on behalf of the open source software community, private industry, academia, and other non-profits.

The mission incorporates three goals:

  • to effectuate changes in U.S. Federal government policies and practices so that all the government may more fully benefit from and utilize free and open source software;
  • to help coordinate these communities to collaborate with the Federal government on technology requirements;
  • to raise awareness and create understanding among federal government leaders in the executive and legislative branches about the values and implications of open source software. OSA may also participate in standards development and other activities that may support its open source mission.

WOSU Commentary 7/21/09

Here is my commentary for WOSU this month.

{CLICK HERE FOR AUDIO}

Healthcare Reform Equals Economic Reform

Andrew Miller, WOSU Commentator

After having my hours cut at work I decided I’d use that time to get a business up and running. Taking lemons and making lemonade is supposedly one path to living the American Dream.

Lemonade anyone?

Unfortunately I had to pause when one of my first thoughts was about paying for healthcare. This month my family will pay over $500 in medical bills, last month it was a couple hundred. Over the past three years we’ve paid several thousand dollars due to various family health issues.

When I see the bills I take a deep breathe, exhale and think, “Thank god we’ve got insurance.” Then I look at the dwindling bank accounts and try to figure out what can be shifted around to make the payments.

I count myself lucky; my employer provides a group plan. To take advantage of the plan I pay a few hundred dollars a month while my employer pays significantly more. Of course I realize that my employer’s contribution is as much a cost to me as it is to them; if they didn’t pay that portion I might get a raise, but then I would have to pay that amount myself.

If we take a moment to add it all together, the past two months have cost me about $3000 in healthcare. I wish I could say I was getting a lot for my money, but I’m not. Just ask my wife about all the doctors’ appointments I haven’t made; it’s a long list.

There’s a tired old debate that we shouldn’t pay for someone else’s healthcare, that the uninsured or underinsured are that way by choice and it is a personal responsibility issue; by socializing healthcare we are going to cause our taxes to balloon.

Currently about 16% of the US is uninsured, the rest have a hodge-podge of different options. Instead of harnessing the buying power of over 300 million people we have redundant systems upon redundant system failing to meet people’s needs.

Personally, I would argue that we are already paying an excessive tax; my combined current healthcare costs are the equivalent of about 17% of my salary. However, for some reason we still call this a “benefit”. Imagine the savings if we didn’t have all of the redundancies. Now imagine if you didn’t have to worry about paying for healthcare at all.

So let’s consider all of the people like myself who have either lost pay or lost their job all together. Once any of us become self-employed, once we chase after that American Dream, we automatically have to climb the mountain of healthcare costs or go without.

Economists and politicians are pinning the recovery of our economy on plucky entrepreneurs willing to fuel the economic engines. Instead of forcing them to choose between being healthy and helping the economy isn’t it about time we take healthcare out of the equation?

After having my hours cut at work I decided I’d use that time to get a business up and running. Taking lemons and making lemonade is supposedly one path to living the American Dream.

Lemonade anyone?

Unfortunately I had to pause when one of my first thoughts was about paying for healthcare. This month my family will pay over $500 in medical bills, last month it was a couple hundred. Over the past three years we’ve paid several thousand dollars due to various family health issues.

When I see the bills I take a deep breathe, exhale and think, “Thank god we’ve got insurance.” Then I look at the dwindling bank accounts and try to figure out what can be shifted around to make the payments.

I count myself lucky; my employer provides a group plan. To take advantage of the plan I pay a few hundred dollars a month while my employer pays significantly more. Of course I realize that my employer’s contribution is as much a cost to me as it is to them; if they didn’t pay that portion I might get a raise, but then I would have to pay that amount myself.

If we take a moment to add it all together, the past two months have cost me about $3000 in healthcare. I wish I could say I was getting a lot for my money, but I’m not. Just ask my wife about all the doctors’ appointments I haven’t made; it’s a long list.

There’s a tired old debate that we shouldn’t pay for someone else’s healthcare, that the uninsured or underinsured are that way by choice and it is a personal responsibility issue; by socializing healthcare we are going to cause our taxes to balloon.

Currently about 16% of the US is uninsured, the rest have a hodge-podge of different options. Instead of harnessing the buying power of over 300 million people we have redundant systems upon redundant system failing to meet people’s needs.

Personally, I would argue that we are already paying an excessive tax; my combined current healthcare costs are the equivalent of about 17% of my salary. However, for some reason we still call this a “benefit”. Imagine the savings if we didn’t have all of the redundancies. Now imagine if you didn’t have to worry about paying for healthcare at all.

So let’s consider all of the people like myself who have either lost pay or lost their job all together. Once any of us become self-employed, once we chase after that American Dream, we automatically have to climb the mountain of healthcare costs or go without.

Economists and politicians are pinning the recovery of our economy on plucky entrepreneurs willing to fuel the economic engines. Instead of forcing them to choose between being healthy and helping the economy isn’t it about time we take healthcare out of the equation?

Digitalocracy meet The New Socialism

As you may or may not remember I’ve talked a good bit here and on my personal blog about a social movement I’ve dubbed the digitalocracy. While I’ve skirted around the issue of whether or not it is in fact a new type of socialism writer Kevin Kelly feels secure in calling it exactly as he sees it, this is his idea of The New Socialism.

Mr. Kelly does a great job of relating several technological advances to how we are acting in a very social way (sharing, collaboration and value based on community instead of capital) and how that might change the fundamentals of our offline society.

Most important, and defining, about these ideas and the social movements occurring around them is the fact that they are happening independent of government, industry or national borders. This is a human movement, not one of a single culture, race or creed.

You can see more of my posts related to the digitalocracy here and here. You can read the full article by Kevin Kelly here. Below is a snippet of that article from Wired.com.

Communal aspects of digital culture run deep and wide. Wikipedia is just one remarkable example of an emerging collectivism—and not just Wikipedia but wikiness at large. Ward Cunningham, who invented the first collaborative Web page in 1994, tracks nearly 150 wiki engines today, each powering myriad sites. Wetpaint, launched just three years ago, hosts more than 1 million communal efforts. Widespread adoption of the share-friendly Creative Commons alternative copyright license and the rise of ubiquitous file-sharing are two more steps in this shift. Mushrooming collaborative sites like Digg, StumbleUpon, the Hype Machine, and Twine have added weight to this great upheaval. Nearly every day another startup proudly heralds a new way to harness community action. These developments suggest a steady move toward a sort of socialism uniquely tuned for a networked world.

Andrew Miller Consulting LogoCreative Commons License BY-NC-SA

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution, Non-Commercial, Sharealike 3.0 License